Within UFO Deadlines
How the Internet Globalised UFO Deadlines
Online publishing transformed local channelled messages into international countdowns watched and repeated by dispersed audiences.
On this page
- From meetings and newsletters to viral posts
- The 2008 mass sighting model
- Why online predictions spread so efficiently
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The internet changed UFO prophecy from a message delivered to a small circle into a public countdown that could cross borders within hours. Before networked media, predictions of alien landings or cosmic rescue usually travelled through meetings, lectures, printed newsletters and specialist magazines. By the late 1990s and 2000s, a channelled statement could instead be copied onto websites, forwarded by email, discussed on forums, translated by supporters and repackaged as video. Thousands of people who had never met the prophet could watch the same deadline approach together.
This transformation did more than enlarge the audience. It altered the structure of prophetic failure. Online archives could preserve the original promise, but websites could also be edited, older posts buried and explanations circulated immediately after nothing happened. The result was a faster cycle of anticipation, disappointment and reinterpretation. The clearest milestones are the internet-based Ground Crew predictions of the 1990s and Blossom Goodchild’s promised worldwide UFO appearance on 14 October 2008. Together, they show how networked media globalised UFO deadlines without making them more reliable.
From newsletters to networked countdowns
Earlier UFO prophets generally depended on physical communities and comparatively slow publishing systems. A channelled message might first be read aloud at a meeting, typed into a circular or printed in a contactee magazine. Its reach was constrained by geography, mailing lists, printing costs and the willingness of editors to reproduce it. Even highly publicised failures remained tied to recognisable groups and leaders.
The web weakened those constraints. A claimant no longer needed a large organisation, a publisher or extensive press coverage. A personal website could function simultaneously as pulpit, archive, recruitment centre and news service. Email allowed followers to forward messages beyond the original group, while discussion boards gave geographically dispersed believers somewhere to compare interpretations and prepare for the expected event.
Researchers of online religion have distinguished between simply placing religious information online and practising religion through online interaction. UFO prophecy increasingly combined both. Websites published teachings, but participants also formed what scholar Christopher Helland called forms of virtual community: people linked through recurring messages, shared expectations and common rituals despite never gathering in one place. Helland’s work on internet religion, including his study with Susan Palmer of the Ground Crew, identified UFO millennialism as an unusually clear example of belief being created, modified and maintained through digital communication.[Christopher Helland]christopherhelland.comChristopher Helland Professional PresenceChristopher HellandProfessional Presence - Dr. Christopher HellandPrometheus Books. Palmer, S., & Helland, C. (2003). UFO religions onlin…
The internet also changed the experience of time. A printed prediction might be encountered days or weeks after publication. Online, a deadline could be continuously refreshed. Followers posted remaining days, circulated supposed confirmations and watched news reports for signs that the event had begun. The prophecy became less like a private revelation and more like a synchronised media event.
This created several important differences from the newsletter era:
- Reach expanded without formal membership. People could participate by reading, reposting or watching, without joining a movement.
- Repetition could resemble corroboration. The same original message might appear on dozens of sites, creating the impression of multiple sources.
- Expectations became internationally synchronised. Readers in different time zones anticipated the same landing window.
- Failure became immediately public. Critics, believers and uncertain observers could react while the deadline was still passing.
- The historical record became unstable. Posts could be preserved by copying or web archiving, but original pages could also be revised or removed.
These features made online prophecy simultaneously more visible and more difficult to evaluate. The internet preserved evidence of promises, yet it also surrounded those promises with layers of commentary, edited summaries and retrospective explanations.
The Ground Crew created an early internet model
One of the earliest substantial examples was Sheldan Nidle’s Ground Crew project, which moved its activity online in the mid-1990s. Nidle presented channelled communications attributed to a “Galactic Federation” and described an approaching transformation of Earth. Followers were told that they constituted a planetary ground team preparing humanity for extraterrestrial contact.
The central prediction was unusually concrete. Beginning in 1996, Nidle’s messages said that Earth was entering a supposed “photon belt” and that millions of spacecraft would stage a mass landing. One deadline placed the event no later than 17 December 1996. The promised arrival involved not merely a distant light in the sky but an extensive intervention: extraterrestrial forces would neutralise weapons, transform communications and assist humanity’s transition into a peaceful galactic society.[Wikipedia]WikipediaGround Crew ProjectGround Crew Project
Nothing resembling that landing occurred. Subsequent dates around the beginning of 1997 and the spring also passed. The account then incorporated Comet Hale–Bopp, claiming that it concealed a spacecraft and that a further mass-contact event would occur in May 1997. Shortly before that deadline, the visible landing was replaced by an alleged private meeting between extraterrestrial delegations near Australia. After the date passed, the comet’s supposed occupants largely disappeared from the evolving narrative.[Wikipedia]WikipediaGround Crew ProjectGround Crew Project
The significance of the Ground Crew lies less in the content of any one prediction than in the way the internet supported continuous revision. Palmer and Helland treated it as a case of “UFO religions online”, focusing on how the narrative changed as deadlines failed. Their analysis described a movement from a relatively direct promise of technological rescue towards a more spiritual and participatory mission. Instead of waiting passively for alien ships, followers were increasingly instructed to raise human consciousness, organise meditation, support environmental renewal and build a worldwide “network of light”.[Internet Archive]archive.orgencyclopedicsour0000unse q7a9Internet ArchiveEncyclopedic sourcebook of UFO religions25 Dec 2023 —… 17. UFO Religions Online: Prophetic Failures and the Narrative…
This adjustment protected the larger worldview. A visible landing could be disproved by the empty sky, but an invisible change in collective consciousness was much harder to test. Responsibility also shifted. The extraterrestrials had not necessarily failed to arrive; humanity was said to require further preparation, spiritual development or planetary stability.
Online publishing made that transition unusually smooth. New messages could be added rapidly, while old promises receded down the website or vanished altogether. Helland observed that material from the movement’s most conspicuous period of failed predictions was no longer readily available online, meaning that later visitors might encounter the revised spiritual programme without seeing the precise earlier deadlines.[Wikipedia]WikipediaGround Crew ProjectGround Crew Project
The case therefore revealed a central paradox of internet prophecy. Digital communication can create a permanent record, but only when material is independently archived and clearly dated. A website controlled by the predictor is not a neutral archive. Its changing pages may present the latest version of the belief while obscuring the steps by which earlier claims were abandoned.
The 2008 mass-sighting model
Blossom Goodchild’s 2008 prediction showed what happened when the same basic structure entered a faster, more participatory web. Goodchild, an Australian-based channeler, published messages attributed to a group called the Federation of Light. The messages announced that a large spacecraft would appear on 14 October 2008 and remain visible for three days, providing unmistakable evidence of extraterrestrial existence.
The claim was suited to online circulation. It contained a specific date, a dramatic visual event and a universal audience. No specialist knowledge was needed to understand it: either an enormous craft would remain in the sky or it would not. Goodchild’s own later compilations preserve references to pressing “send” on the announcement, receiving worldwide responses and continuing to publish communications as the deadline approached.[Blossom Goodchild]blossomgoodchild.comBlossom Goodchild Eyes To The Skies | Blossom GoodchildBlossom GoodchildEyes To The Skies | Blossom GoodchildNovember 12, 2018 — This edition of Snapshot includes all the channelled communicat…
Supporters reproduced the message across blogs, forums and video platforms. Contemporary web posts framed the prediction as a global visitation and urged readers to look upwards on the appointed day. Australian press coverage described an internet-driven frenzy around the claim, while bookmakers reportedly received enough UFO-related wagers to restrict further betting.[com.au]dailytelegraph.com.auDaily Telegraph The aliens are coming … todayDaily TelegraphThe aliens are coming … todayOctober 14, 2008 - 2:41PM… Queensland-based "channeler" Blossom Goodchild says aliens info…
This was not simply an old-style prophecy advertised online. The web became part of the event itself. Its international audience could collectively prepare, speculate and report supposed sightings. Videos and forum posts allowed people to treat unrelated lights, clouds or aircraft as possible advance signs. The expectation generated its own stream of evidence-like material before the promised craft had appeared.
On 14 October, no immense spacecraft remained publicly visible for the announced three-day period. The prediction therefore failed under its own stated conditions. Yet the surrounding online network did not produce a single, agreed conclusion. Some observers treated the empty sky as decisive disproof. Others suggested that human fear had prevented the display, that the event occurred on another spiritual level, that sightings in particular places partially fulfilled the promise or that the date had been misunderstood.
The internet enabled these alternatives to appear almost immediately. In a small face-to-face group, a leader might need to formulate an explanation and persuade followers personally. Online, supporters could generate many explanations independently. The prophet no longer held exclusive control over reinterpretation; the wider audience could help rescue, soften or fragment the failed claim.
At the same time, Goodchild’s continuing website preserved the episode as part of an ongoing body of channelled material rather than erasing it completely. This makes the case useful for comparison with more heavily revised online movements. Digital prophecy does not always disappear after failure. It may instead be reframed as one stage in an extended relationship with an alleged source, with attention moving from the missed event to later messages.[Blossom Goodchild]blossomgoodchild.comBlossom Goodchild Eyes To The Skies | Blossom GoodchildBlossom GoodchildEyes To The Skies | Blossom GoodchildNovember 12, 2018 — This edition of Snapshot includes all the channelled communicat…
Why online predictions spread so efficiently
The reach of internet UFO prophecy cannot be explained solely by credulity. The format itself contains features that encourage circulation, including among sceptics.
First, a dated prediction is inherently shareable. “A spacecraft will appear on 14 October” is easier to remember and repeat than a complex spiritual doctrine. It gives every reader a reason to return: the truth of the claim appears to have a scheduled resolution.
Second, UFO predictions mix cosmic scale with low-cost participation. A person need not donate money, travel or join a commune. They can forward a message, watch the sky or post a reaction. This creates a very large outer audience whose members may range from committed believers to curious spectators and mockers.
Third, repetition strips away provenance. A channelled statement copied from site to site may lose the name of its original author or the qualifications surrounding it. Readers can encounter several versions and infer that numerous psychics or witnesses independently agree. Research into online conspiracy ecosystems has found that sites devoted to UFOs and aliens form interconnected networks and frequently link into broader misinformation environments. Such linking can increase visibility even when no new evidence has been added.[arXiv]arxiv.orgOpen source on arxiv.org.
Fourth, platform systems reward engaging material rather than verified prediction. Studies of conspiracy content on YouTube have found that recommendation systems historically promoted videos involving conspiratorial and apocalyptic themes, although platform policies and algorithmic behaviour have changed over time. A 2024 study of highly viewed paranormal videos likewise found that online video can influence beliefs about UFO and haunting claims, particularly when dramatic material is presented without strong critical context.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv A Longitudinal Analysis of You Tube's Promotion of Conspiracy VideosarXiv A Longitudinal Analysis of You Tube's Promotion of Conspiracy Videos
Fifth, online groups can become interpretive communities. Research on conspiracy-oriented Facebook activity has identified “echo chambers” in which users mainly interact with material that reinforces a shared worldview. Debunking often reaches only a fraction of the relevant audience, and the most committed participants may respond by increasing rather than reducing their engagement. These findings do not prove that every UFO-prophecy audience behaves identically, but they help explain why a missed deadline does not automatically dissolve the online network that carried it.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Debunking in a World of TribesarXiv Debunking in a World of Tribes
Finally, sceptical attention can amplify the prophecy. Journalists, bloggers and critics repeat the date in order to examine or ridicule it. That coverage may expose the claim to far more people than the original channeler could reach. The prediction gains visibility even when most of the new audience rejects it.
Failure moves at internet speed
Networked media compresses the period between prediction and reinterpretation. When the expected event does not occur, discussion does not stop; it changes direction.
Several recurring online responses are visible across cases:
The event becomes invisible. A promised physical manifestation is redefined as spiritual, dimensional or perceptible only to suitably prepared observers.
The audience becomes responsible. Fear, negativity or insufficient collective consciousness is said to have delayed the visitors.
The deadline becomes approximate. Specific dates are replaced by phrases such as “soon”, “when conditions permit” or “at the appropriate divine time”.
Ambiguous material becomes partial confirmation. Videos of lights, lens effects, balloons or unusual clouds are circulated as evidence that something happened, even if they do not match the original promise.
The prediction becomes a test. Failure is reframed as an exercise intended to unite believers, awaken humanity or expose scepticism.
Attention shifts to the next message. A fresh revelation supplies a new timetable or a broader mission before the previous claim has been fully assessed.
These strategies existed before the internet, but online publishing multiplies their number and speed. Hundreds of participants can produce explanations, selectively quote earlier messages and create new media within hours. There may be no definitive post-failure statement, only a dispersed field of competing revisions.
That dispersion makes outcomes harder to measure. A physical group can be counted, observed and followed after a disappointment. An online audience contains silent readers, temporary visitors, content creators and people participating ironically. Claims about how many “followers” remained after an online failure are therefore often unreliable. Helland noted this problem in relation to the virtual Ground Crew: its web presence demonstrated continuing activity, but could not reveal how many readers still accepted the original predictions.[Wikipedia]WikipediaGround Crew ProjectGround Crew Project
Recent scholarship also cautions against assuming that failed prophecy normally strengthens belief. A broad review published in the International Journal for the Study of New Religions argues that group decline or disappearance is more common than the famous cognitive-dissonance story suggests, especially when prophecy depends on a leader’s novel private revelation. Online visibility after failure may therefore overstate continuity: a website, archived video or handful of active supporters can survive even when most of the original audience has quietly departed.[DOI]doi.orgOpen source on doi.org.
The record is larger but less stable
The internet has made UFO deadlines easier to document. Screenshots, mirrored posts, cached pages and archived videos can establish that a prediction was published before its supposed fulfilment date. This is a major improvement over oral recollections or undated newsletters.
Yet digital evidence has its own weaknesses. Pages are updated without clear change histories. Links decay. Videos are deleted. Reposts omit qualifications. A claimant may remove an exact date while retaining more general language about imminent contact. Later readers then encounter a softened version of the prophecy and may not realise that a testable event was once promised.
The problem became apparent as early UFO-oriented groups learned to use search engines deliberately. In 1997, Wired reported that the Heaven’s Gate website embedded repeated terms such as “UFO”, “space alien”, “prophecy” and “end times” in its source code to attract search traffic. Although Heaven’s Gate was not primarily a case of a missed public internet deadline, its web strategy demonstrated how quickly apocalyptic UFO belief had adapted to online discoverability.[WIRED]wired.comViewing Source at Heaven's GateViewing Source at Heaven's Gate
The key evidential lesson is therefore to preserve the original wording, publication date and promised observation. A prediction should be judged against what it said before the deadline, not against a later summary. In the Goodchild case, the relevant claim was not merely that extraterrestrial contact was approaching. It was that a large craft would make a prolonged, recognisable appearance beginning on 14 October 2008. In the Ground Crew case, the original promise concerned millions of ships and a mass intervention, not simply gradual spiritual improvement.
How the internet globalised UFO deadlines
The rise of internet UFO prophecy did not create the underlying themes. Channelled extraterrestrials, imminent landings, planetary transformation and explanations for delay all pre-dated the web. What networked media changed was their operating scale.
A local revelation could become an international countdown without an established movement behind it. Participants could gather around an event window rather than a shared institution. Online repetition could turn one source into the appearance of many. When the deadline failed, reinterpretation could emerge immediately from both the prophet and the audience. Some followers left, some remained, and others participated only long enough to watch the prediction collapse.
The Ground Crew illustrates the early website-based model: a continuing stream of messages, shifting deadlines and gradual spiritualisation of a promised physical landing. The 14 October 2008 prediction illustrates the viral model: a simple global deadline spreading through blogs, forums, video and news coverage far beyond the channeler’s immediate following.
Neither produced the announced public event. Their historical importance lies elsewhere. They established the pattern by which UFO prophecy became a networked spectacle—globally visible before the deadline, collectively interpreted as it approached and rapidly rewritten after the sky remained unchanged.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How the Internet Globalised UFO Deadlines. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Oxford Handbook of New Religious Movements
The study of new religious movements (NRMs) is one of the fastest-growing areas of religious studies. This handbook covers the current st...
When Prophecy Fails
The study reported in this volume grew out of some theoretical work, one phase of which bore specifically on the behavior of individuals...
The Believing Brain
Synthesizing thirty years of research, psychologist and science historian, Michael Shermer upends the traditional thinking about how huma...
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
Rating: 4.5/5 from 43 Google Books ratings
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Endnotes
1.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Ground Crew Project
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_Crew_Project
2.
Source: archive.org
Title: encyclopedicsour0000unse q7a9
Link:https://archive.org/details/encyclopedicsour0000unse_q7a9
Source snippet
Internet ArchiveEncyclopedic sourcebook of UFO religions25 Dec 2023 —... 17. UFO Religions Online: Prophetic Failures and the Narrative...
3.
Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10880
4.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv A Longitudinal Analysis of You Tube’s Promotion of Conspiracy Videos
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.03318
5.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Debunking in a World of Tribes
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.04267
6.
Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1558%2Fijsnr.33085
7.
Source: wired.com
Title: Viewing Source at Heaven’s Gate
Link:https://www.wired.com/1997/03/viewing-source-at-heavens-gate
8.
Source: doi.org
Title: Debunking “When Prophecy Fails”
Link:https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fjhbs.70043
9.
Source: doi.org
Link:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00077.x
10.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/EdintFest/videos/the-story-of-the-first-ever-ufo-doomsday-cult-reimagined-when-prophecy-fails-dra/1002716302099561/
11.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/GirlssFacts/posts/she-pulled-that-from-thin-air-30-things-psychics-predicted-that-ended-up-becomin/1476535644503994/
12.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/8461791483/posts/10164704159071484/
13.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9B73B3FF1366D222
14.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/shorts/7L8HLq0-Jmo
15.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Ground Crew Project
Link:https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_Crew_Project
16.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Sheldan Nidle
Link:https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheldan_Nidle
17.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%B0%E3%83%A9%E3%82%A6%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89%E3%82%AF%E3%83%AB%E3%83%BC%E3%83%97%E3%83%AD%E3%82%B8%E3%82%A7%E3%82%AF%E3%83%88
18.
Source: everything.explained.today
Link:https://everything.explained.today/Ground_Crew_Project/
19.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Cult Next Door | Heaven’s Gate
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95UXqXXX4rA
Source snippet
End of Days Cults, the Day After | Cognitive Dissonance (Video Essay)...
20.
Source: youtube.com
Title: End of Days Cults, the Day After | Cognitive Dissonance (Video Essay)
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yVuauQjkDc
Source snippet
The Seekers: When UFO Prophecy Failed and the Cult Stayed...
21.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Seekers: When UFO Prophecy Failed and the Cult Stayed
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xlp4qETDQL8
Source snippet
10 Doomsday Cults That Got It Wrong | When Prophecy Fails...
22.
Source: youtube.com
Title: 10 Doomsday Cults That Got It Wrong | When Prophecy Fails
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5V6FmVS_Gr0
Source snippet
October 14th uncovered and Blossom GoodChild & Federation Of Light 3...
23.
Source: youtube.com
Title: October 14th uncovered and Blossom Good Child & Federation Of Light 3
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NW_svXHXQY
Source snippet
Blossom Goodchild UFO prediction 2008 October 14th uncovered and Blossom GoodChild & Federation Of Light 3 Lightandbodychurch...
24.
Source: christopherhelland.com
Title: Christopher Helland Professional Presence
Link:https://christopherhelland.com/publications-presentations
Source snippet
Christopher HellandProfessional Presence - Dr. Christopher HellandPrometheus Books. Palmer, S., & Helland, C. (2003). UFO religions onlin...
25.
Source: christopherhelland.com
Title: Christopher Helland Publications
Link:https://christopherhelland.com/test
Source snippet
Christopher HellandUFO Religions Online: Prophetic Failures and the Narrative Techniques of the Ground Crew. In: James R. Lewis (Ed.), Th...
26.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Title: Blossom Goodchild Eyes To The Skies | Blossom Goodchild
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/eyes-to-the-skies/
Source snippet
Blossom GoodchildEyes To The Skies | Blossom GoodchildNovember 12, 2018 — This edition of Snapshot includes all the channelled communicat...
Published: November 12, 2018
27.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Title: Blossom Goodchild Channelling Indexes | Blossom Goodchild
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/channelling-indexes/
Source snippet
(~) (p.14) March 12th [http://blossomgoodchild.blogspot.com/](http://blossomgoodchild.blogspot.com/) Please see blog for details regarding A GLOBAL VISUAL AFFECT...
28.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/the-federation-of-light/
Source snippet
Blossom GoodchildThe Federation Of Light | Blossom GoodchildThis edition of Snapshot includes all the channelled communications between T...
29.
Source: dailytelegraph.com.au
Title: Daily Telegraph The aliens are coming … today
Link:https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/the-aliens-are-coming–today/news-story/96ade568af3eadf0c6a425f1a563b6a2
Source snippet
Daily TelegraphThe aliens are coming … todayOctober 14, 2008 - 2:41PM... Queensland-based "channeler" Blossom Goodchild says aliens info...
Published: October 14, 2008
30.
Source: psychedelicadventure.net
Link:https://www.psychedelicadventure.net/2008/09/
31.
Source: cultopedia.org
Title: Ground Crew Project
Link:https://www.cultopedia.org/index.php/Ground_Crew_Project
32.
Source: christopherhelland.com
Link:https://christopherhelland.com/research
Additional References
33.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313714759_Individual_Suicide_and_the_End_of_the_World_Destruction_and_Transformation_in_UFO_and_Alien-Based_Religions
34.
Source: brookguitars.com
Link:https://www.brookguitars.com/author/stve/
35.
Source: gwern.net
Link:https://gwern.net/doc/psychology/cognitive-bias/2025-kelly.pdf
36.
Source: lavocedifiore.org
Link:https://www.lavocedifiore.org/SPIP/article.php3?id_article=3610
37.
Source: awakening-worldwide.nl
Link:https://www.awakening-worldwide.nl/galactic-federation/geschiedenis/ground-crew-project
38.
Source: digitaldefoe.org
Link:https://digitaldefoe.org/category/issues/page/2/
39.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/15k2w0i/what_are_the_best_websites_related_to_ufos_indepth/
40.
Source: thedebrief.org
Link:https://thedebrief.org/alarm-bells-went-off-new-research-takes-a-critical-look-at-the-landmark-ufo-cult-study-when-prophecy-fails/
41.
Source: ore.exeter.ac.uk
Link:https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/ndownloader/files/56711174
42.
Source: liverpoolway.co.uk
Title: The Liverpool Way Bobhorse, The Federatin of Light and a “new higher vibration
Link:https://www.liverpoolway.co.uk/index.php?%2Fforums%2Ftopic%2F60859-bobhorse-the-federatin-of-light-and-a-new-higher-vibration-of-love-shocker%2F=&comment=1257043&do=findComment