Within UFO Deadlines
Can Channelled UFO Messages Ever Be Tested?
Several failed arrival claims began as messages attributed to extraterrestrial beings rather than observations open to outside verification.
On this page
- How channelled predictions are presented
- Source authority without independent access
- Testing claims derived from private revelation
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Channelled UFO predictions begin with a claim of communication rather than a publicly observable encounter. A person says that an extraterrestrial, interdimensional or spiritually advanced being has spoken through automatic writing, trance, inner hearing or another private process. The message may then announce a landing, rescue, catastrophe or mass appearance at a stated time.
Such a prediction can be tested at the point where it promises a visible event. The alleged source, however, usually cannot be examined independently. Outsiders cannot interview the communicator, inspect the communication channel or distinguish an extraterrestrial transmission from imagination, misinterpretation, performance or sincerely experienced altered consciousness. This creates a basic evidential imbalance: the prediction may be public, but the authority behind it remains private.
Failed cases involving Dorothy Martin, Ruth Norman and Blossom Goodchild show how this structure affects both the creation and the later defence of UFO prophecies. When an announced event does not occur, a further channelled message can explain the failure without supplying any new evidence that outsiders can verify.
How channelled predictions are presented
Researchers use channeling for practices in which information is said to pass through a human recipient from a being or intelligence outside that persons ordinary self. The claimed source might be a spirit, ascended teacher, extraterrestrial civilisation or entity existing on another plane. Trance is not essential: some channels speak in an altered state, while others write, dictate or describe impressions received while fully conscious.[Springer]link.springer.comCulture, Medicine, and Psychiatry | Springer Nature LinkJuly 1, 2021 * Cite this article… Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry Aims a…
In UFO prediction movements, channelled material often combines two different kinds of statement. One is spiritual or moral: humanity must raise its consciousness, reject violence or prepare for a new age. The other is empirical: a spacecraft will arrive on a given date, a disaster will occur, or extraterrestrials will make themselves visible. The first type is difficult to measure. The second creates an apparent opportunity for a clear test.
The authority of the prediction does not normally come from astronomy, radar data or a chain of independently documented observations. It comes from the channels asserted access to beings who supposedly possess knowledge unavailable to ordinary humans. Anthropological work on New Age channeling describes such unseen agents as figures credited with privileged or strategic information about hidden realities and future events. The channel therefore acts not merely as a commentator but as the sole human gateway to an inaccessible source.[ResearchGate]researchgate.netThis article understands religion as a form of imagination, giving human properties to nonhuman agents (and vice versa), and thus, the…
That structure helps explain why channelled predictions can sound unusually confident. The speaker may present the message not as speculation but as a transmission from a civilisation portrayed as technologically and spiritually superior. Precise dates, spacecraft descriptions and assurances of benevolent intent can give the claim the appearance of inside information even when no independent evidence supports the supposed contact.
The source problem: authority without independent access
Ordinary testimony can be questioned at several levels. Investigators may compare witnesses, inspect records, examine physical traces and ask whether observers could have mistaken an aircraft, astronomical object or atmospheric effect. A channelled message provides far fewer points of access.
The public can question the channel, but not the alleged extraterrestrial speaker. It usually cannot establish:
- whether any external communication occurred;
- whether the message was recorded fully and before the prediction became public;
- whether wording or dates changed during transmission or publication;
- whether another person using the same method could obtain the same information independently;
- or what result would show that the supposed source did not exist.
This does not prove that a channel is dishonest. Trance and possession-like experiences have been studied as culturally meaningful experiences that are not necessarily pathological, and participants may sincerely understand the words or impressions as coming from another intelligence. Sincerity, however, answers a different question from accuracy. A person can honestly report an experience while being mistaken about its origin or meaning.[Taylor & Francis Online]tandfonline.comSource details in endnotes.
The difficulty becomes sharper when the source is treated as incapable of error. A failed prediction can then be assigned to human misunderstanding, incomplete reception or an extraterrestrial change of plan. Each explanation preserves the authority of the unseen communicator by moving responsibility to a part of the process that outsiders cannot inspect.
Channelled predictions therefore have two layers of testability. The promised public event may be straightforward to check. The alleged source behind it is not. A missing spacecraft can refute the statement that a spacecraft would visibly appear at a specified time, but it does not automatically end belief in the channel if followers permit new messages to revise what the earlier one really meant.
Dorothy Martin: automatic writing and a moving timetable
Dorothy Martins 1954 prediction is an early and influential example. Martin said she received messages by automatic writing from advanced beings associated with the planet Clarion. The communications warned of earthquakes and floods on 21 December 1954 and promised that selected people would be rescued by spacecraft. Contemporary local history records identify the prediction as a message attributed to the Clarion beings rather than a conclusion drawn from physical UFO evidence.[Oak Park River Forest Museum]oprfmuseum.orgseekers cuyler avenueOak Park River Forest MuseumThe Seekers of Cuyler AvenueIn the autumn of 1954, Dorothy shared a message with the Laugheads, the beings of…
The predictions credibility within the group depended heavily on Martins status as recipient. The supposed senders were not available for independent contact, and the messages formed an evolving body of revelation rather than a fixed technical document. According to accounts of the episode, expected rescue times shifted, while additional communications continued to guide preparations. When neither the catastrophe nor the promised rescue occurred, another message declared that the groups spiritual influence had helped spare the world.[The New Yorker]newyorker.comThe New Yorker Is Cognitive Dissonance Actually a Thing?However, recently unsealed archival materials reveal that Festinger and his team may have influenced the Seekers' behavior more than prev…
This response illustrates the central evidential problem. The absence of the predicted flood should have counted against the original warning. Instead, the same private communication process that generated the warning supplied a reason why its non-occurrence was a success. No outsider could ask the Clarion beings whether they had changed their plans or whether the later explanation accurately represented them.
The episode became famous through When Prophecy Fails, the study associated with Leon Festinger and the theory of cognitive dissonance. Its account of the groups behaviour must now be treated carefully. Archival research published by Thomas Kelly argues that the investigators intervened extensively, that the group had sought publicity before the failed date and that many participants abandoned the beliefs more rapidly than the classic account suggested. Those findings challenge broad claims about how all believers respond to disconfirmation, although they do not alter the simpler fact that the announced flood and spacecraft rescue did not occur.[wiley.com]onlinelibrary.wiley.comOnline Library Debunking When Prophecy FailsOnline Library Debunking When Prophecy Fails
For evaluating channelled prediction sources, the most important lesson is therefore narrower than the traditional psychological story. Martins claim rested on communications available through her and a small circle. When the observable forecast failed, the revelation system remained capable of producing revised times and protective explanations without becoming more independently accessible.
Ruth Norman: repeated landings within a complete belief system
Ruth Norman, known within the Unarius Academy of Science as Uriel, also presented extraterrestrial arrival claims as information from higher beings. Unarius combined spiritualism, reincarnation, cosmic history and anticipated contact with an Intergalactic Confederation. Its predictions were not isolated guesses; they were embedded in a detailed worldview, ritual life and institutional community.
Norman announced in the 1970s that extraterrestrial spacecraft would land and bring transformative knowledge to humanity. Plans reportedly included the purchase and preparation of land near Jamul, California, as a landing site. The expected timing changed, and Norman later made a public wager that extraterrestrials would arrive within a year. After that prediction failed, the anticipated landing was eventually associated with 2001.[Wikipedia]WikipediaRuth NormanRuth Norman
Sociologist Diana Tumminia studied Unarius over several years and found that repeated failure did not operate as a single decisive experiment. The group possessed a wider lifeworld of teachings, activities and interpretive practices. Failed arrival dates could be absorbed through explanations concerning humanitys unreadiness, mistaken interpretation or changes in the cosmic schedule.[OUP Academic]academic.oup.comOpen source on oup.com.
This is important because it shows why testing only the date may not settle the source claim for participants. To an outsider, the fleet will land in 2001 is a statement defeated by the absence of a landing. Within a channel-based system, however, the failed date can be separated from the authority of the beings behind it. The teaching may be retained while the calendar is revised.
The source is protected by the breadth of the surrounding narrative. If the predicted visitors are said to act according to humanitys spiritual condition, then almost any outcome can be explained after the fact. Arrival proves that humanity is ready; delay proves that it is not. A prediction framed in those terms does not discriminate reliably between competing explanations.
Blossom Goodchild: a public internet-age test
The 14 October 2008 prediction associated with Australian channel Blossom Goodchild offered an unusually clear public test. Goodchild said that the Federation of Light had announced that a vast craft would appear in the skies for three days in a manner that would demonstrate the existence of other life. Her own website preserves the claim and describes it explicitly as information received through channelled encounters.[Blossom Goodchild]blossomgoodchild.comOpen source on blossomgoodchild.com.
The message spread widely online before the date. Contemporary reports described extensive discussion across UFO forums, websites and video platforms, with supporters encouraged to watch and record the sky. The internet allowed a private revelation to become a globally shared prediction without adding independent access to the alleged source. Millions could repeat the message, but repetition did not constitute corroboration.[religiondispatches.org]religiondispatches.orgOpen source on religiondispatches.org.
No vast, publicly verifiable craft appeared for the promised three-day display. Even writers sympathetic to UFO claims acknowledged after 14 October that the announced event had not happened. Goodchilds website later retained material looking back on the episode, including an update issued on 16 October and a retrospective discussion ten years later.[prophecynews.co.uk]prophecynews.co.ukProphecy News Federation of Light UFO fails to materializeProphecy News Federation of Light UFO fails to materialize
The case is especially useful because the original claim was difficult to reduce to a minor ambiguous light. It promised an enormous and sustained manifestation intended to prove extraterrestrial existence. A few isolated photographs or reports of ordinary-looking lights could not reasonably satisfy that standard.
Yet the failure did not create access to the Federation of Light for questioning. Any explanation still had to pass through Goodchild or other people claiming comparable contact. Later channelled material could discuss hidden motives, human reactions or postponed plans, but those additions did not independently verify that the original message came from extraterrestrials.
The medium changed from handwritten revelation to digital circulation, while the source problem remained the same.
Can channelled UFO messages be tested?
Channelled claims are testable only to the extent that they produce clear consequences outside the private revelation itself. A useful assessment separates four questions that are often blurred together.
Was the prediction documented beforehand?
A dated publication, recording or archived webpage is stronger evidence than a prediction recalled only after the supposed event. The original wording matters because later summaries may make a vague statement appear more precise than it was.
Did it specify an observable result?
A visible craft above a named region for three days is testable. Statements about invisible assistance, altered spiritual energy or contact occurring on another plane are not testable by ordinary observation unless the claimant identifies measurable consequences.
Was the success condition fixed in advance?
Before the deadline, the claimant should state what would count as fulfilment and what would count as failure. Otherwise, satellites, clouds, camera artefacts or unrelated UFO reports may be relabelled afterwards as partial confirmation.
Could the source claim survive every possible outcome?
If appearance, delay, silence and contradiction can all be explained as decisions by hidden extraterrestrials, the claim predicts no result that distinguishes it from error. Scientific testability does not require that every entity be directly visible, but it does require consequences capable of separating one explanation from its rivals. Independent replication and corroboration are central because they reduce dependence on a single observer or interpreter.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv Criteria of Science, Cosmology, and Lessons of HistoryarXiv Criteria of Science, Cosmology, and Lessons of History
A strong test would therefore require more than another channelled assurance. It might involve several independent recipients recording specific information under controlled conditions; sealed predictions with fixed deadlines; precise observational details unavailable through normal means; and confirmation by instruments or witnesses who were not recruited from the belief community.
Even then, a correct prediction would not by itself prove extraterrestrial authorship. Accurate information could result from prior knowledge, inference, coincidence, leakage or fraud. Establishing the source would demand additional evidence connecting the information to the alleged communicator.
Why post-failure messages carry little evidential weight
After a failed UFO prediction, further channelled explanations often introduce conditions absent from the original announcement. Humanity was fearful. Governments interfered. Collective consciousness changed the outcome. The visitors remained present but invisible. The event occurred spiritually rather than physically. The channel translated the date incorrectly.
Some of these explanations are logically possible. Their weakness is that they are usually generated only after the expected observation has failed and cannot be checked independently. They reduce rather than increase the claims exposure to evidence.
This creates an asymmetry:
- Before the deadline, the source receives credit for a bold and specific forecast.
- After the deadline, the source is defended through flexible qualifications.
- The qualifications themselves come through the same channel whose reliability is being questioned.
- No failed outcome is permitted to count against the existence, knowledge or honesty of the alleged communicator.
The process can become circular. The message is trusted because it comes from advanced extraterrestrials, while the existence and authority of those extraterrestrials are inferred largely from the messages. When the prediction fails, another message is used to preserve both parts of the circle.
Unarius scholarship demonstrates how interpretive systems can sustain prophecy by embedding it within a larger world of identity, ritual and meaning. The Goodchild case shows how the same mechanism can operate in a decentralised online audience, where followers need not belong to a formal organisation to circulate reinterpretations.[OUP Academic]academic.oup.comOpen source on oup.com.
A practical credibility standard
The fairest approach is not to dismiss a claim merely because it arose through an unusual experience. It is to judge the public prediction by the same evidential standards applied to any other asserted source of factual information.
A credible channelled UFO forecast would need to become progressively less dependent on the channel. Its details should be preserved before the event, its conditions should remain stable, and its predicted consequences should be independently observable. Repeated failures should lower confidence in the source rather than produce unlimited revisions.
Three distinctions are essential:
- An intense personal experience is not independent evidence of its stated cause.
- A sincere messenger is not necessarily a reliable messenger.
- A failed prediction is not rescued by an explanation that cannot itself be tested.
Channelled UFO predictions are therefore capable of generating testable statements, but channeling does not provide independent support for those statements. Dorothy Martins flood and rescue, Ruth Normans anticipated landings and Blossom Goodchilds three-day spacecraft appearance all became public claims with observable deadlines. Their alleged extraterrestrial sources remained inaccessible before and after failure.
That is the defining weakness of channelled messages as UFO prediction sources: the part of the claim that sounds most authoritative is also the part least open to examination.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Can Channelled UFO Messages Ever Be Tested?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
When Prophecy Fails
The study reported in this volume grew out of some theoretical work, one phase of which bore specifically on the behavior of individuals...
American Cosmic
More than half of American adults and more than seventy-five percent of young Americans believe in intelligent extraterrestrial life. Thi...
The Culting of Brands
Marketing expert Douglas Atkin has spent years re- searching both full-blown cults and companies that use cult-branding techniques. He in...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Endnotes
1.
Source: link.springer.com
Link:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11013-021-09730-9
Source snippet
Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry | Springer Nature LinkJuly 1, 2021 * Cite this article... Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry Aims a...
Published: July 1, 2021
2.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346910439_Channeling_Agency_and_Strategic_Information_The_Semiotic_Ideologies_of_New_Age_Culture
Source snippet
This article understands religion as a form of imagination, giving human properties to nonhuman agents (and vice versa), and thus, the...
3.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Title: Online Library Debunking When Prophecy Fails
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jhbs.70043
4.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Ruth Norman
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Norman
5.
Source: academic.oup.com
Link:https://academic.oup.com/book/7811/chapter-abstract/152993807
6.
Source: academic.oup.com
Link:https://academic.oup.com/book/7811/chapter/152994882
7.
Source: academic.oup.com
Link:https://academic.oup.com/socrel/article-abstract/59/2/157/1696173
8.
Source: corriere.it
Title: della Sera«Oggi sbarcano gli alieni»: la profezia fa il giro del web
Link:https://www.corriere.it/scienze/08_ottobre_14/ufo_alieni_terra_profezia_6414836e-99c2-11dd-a6f3-00144f02aabc.shtml
9.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Criteria of Science, Cosmology, and Lessons of History
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.5215
10.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv Reproducible Research Can Still Be Wrong: Adopting a Prevention Approach
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03169
11.
Source: academic.oup.com
Link:https://academic.oup.com/jaar/article/94/2/319/8650631
12.
Source: researchgate.net
Title: The End Begins in Me: New Forms of Political Action in Israeli Channeling
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267397427_The_End_Begins_in_Me_New_Forms_of_Political_Action_in_Israeli_Channeling
13.
Source: academic.oup.com
Link:https://academic.oup.com/book/7811/chapter-abstract/152994882
14.
Source: academic.oup.com
Link:https://academic.oup.com/book/7811/chapter/152989075
15.
Source: academic.oup.com
Link:https://academic.oup.com/book/7811/chapter/152996479
16.
Source: academic.oup.com
Link:https://academic.oup.com/book/7811/chapter-abstract/152997221
17.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: When Prophecy Fails
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_Prophecy_Fails
18.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Unarius Academy of Science
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unarius_Academy_of_Science
19.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotheology
20.
Source: compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Title: j.1749 8171.2011.00313.x
Link:https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2011.00313.x
21.
Source: onlinelibrary.wiley.com
Link:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbs.70043
22.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397098479_BOUDON_AND_THE_EXTRATERRESTRIALS_A_GENERATIVE_MODEL_OF_THE_EMERGENCE_OF_A_RELIGION
23.
Source: researchgate.net
Title: 249981760 When Prophecy Never Fails Myth and Reality in a Flying Saucer Group
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249981760_When_Prophecy_Never_Fails_Myth_and_Reality_in_a_Flying-Saucer_Group
24.
Source: researchgate.net
Title: 397254906 Debunking When Prophecy Fails
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/397254906_Debunking_When_Prophecy_Fails
25.
Source: youtube.com
Title: When Prophecies Fail
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S6euVitYtqM
Source snippet
Blossom Goodchild ~ The Federation of Light ~ I AM Mantra...
26.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Blossom Goodchild ~ The Federation of Light ~ I AM Mantra
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4akW6JV9bM
27.
Source: tandfonline.com
Link:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13537900120077168
Source snippet
Moreover, within the private sphere to which secularisation has confined channelling, the resulting subjectivism is consonant with normat...
28.
Source: tandfonline.com
Link:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13537903.2020.1759899
Source snippet
[https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-472X](https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-472X) View further author information... * Cite this article... Channeling, a New Age form of spirit me...
29.
Source: oprfmuseum.org
Title: seekers cuyler avenue
Link:https://oprfmuseum.org/this-month-in-history/seekers-cuyler-avenue
Source snippet
Oak Park River Forest MuseumThe Seekers of Cuyler AvenueIn the autumn of 1954, Dorothy shared a message with the Laugheads, the beings of...
30.
Source: newyorker.com
Title: The New Yorker Is Cognitive Dissonance Actually a Thing?
Link:https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-lede/is-cognitive-dissonance-actually-a-thing
Source snippet
However, recently unsealed archival materials reveal that Festinger and his team may have influenced the Seekers' behavior more than prev...
31.
Source: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Link:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41186060/
32.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/eyes-to-the-skies/
33.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/the-federation-of-light/
34.
Source: religiondispatches.org
Link:https://religiondispatches.org/2008/10/14/aliens-arrive-alabama-today
35.
Source: prophecynews.co.uk
Title: Prophecy News Federation of Light UFO fails to materialize
Link:https://www.prophecynews.co.uk/world/1026-federation-of-light-ufo-fails-to-materialize
36.
Source: divinecosmos.com
Title: 410 why nothing happened on october 14th
Link:https://divinecosmos.com/davids-blog/410-why-nothing-happened-on-october-14th/
37.
Source: tandfonline.com
Link:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00335630.2022.2091154
38.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Title: SNAPSHOT with Index
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/SNAPSHOT-with-Index.pdf
39.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Title: The Federation Of Light Channellings 2020
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/The-Federation-Of-Light-Channellings-2020.pdf
40.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Title: 24th october
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/24th-october/
41.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Title: 5th april
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/5th-april/
42.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/The-Federation-Of-Light-Channellings-2015.pdf
43.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Title: Channeling Topics Of Interest 2019
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Channeling-Topics-Of-Interest-2019.pdf
44.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/The-Federation-Of-Light-Channellings-2018.pdf
45.
Source: blossomgoodchild.com
Title: channelling indexes
Link:https://www.blossomgoodchild.com/channelling-indexes/
46.
Source: pepspill.wordpress.com
Link:https://pepspill.wordpress.com/2008/10/13/credibility/
47.
Source: stevemurch.com
Title: When Prophecy Fails
Link:https://stevemurch.com/when-prophecy-fails/2019/03
48.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5MA03Dac4Y
49.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7VNRX879Ns
50.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvFV1v8l-PI
51.
Source: unexplained-mysteries.com
Link:https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/?app=core&content_class=forums_Topic&content_commentid=2551587&content_id=136655&controller=content&do=find&module=system
52.
Source: jstor.org
Link:https://www.jstor.org/stable/3712078
Additional References
53.
Source: papers.ssrn.com
Link:https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4311002
Source snippet
Keywords: semiotic ideologies, cognitive science of religion, agency, New Age culture, ufology, channeling...
54.
Source: gwern.net
Link:https://gwern.net/doc/psychology/cognitive-bias/2025-kelly.pdf
55.
Source: web2.ph.utexas.edu
Link:https://web2.ph.utexas.edu/~coker2/calbum/calbum.html
56.
Source: lavocedifiore.org
Link:https://www.lavocedifiore.org/SPIP/article.php3?id_article=3610
57.
Source: degruyterbrill.com
Link:https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1525/9780520962125-013/html?lang=en
58.
Source: degruyterbrill.com
Link:https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1525/9780520962125-013/html
59.
Source: csmonitor.com
Link:https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2011/0518/Judgment-Day-Five-failed-end-of-the-world-predictions/December
60.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/Soulnexus/comments/c5zwn4/recent_channeling_from_blossom_goodchild_saying/
61.
Source: cambridge.org
Link:https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/language-and-culture-in-medieval-britain/serpents-headjews-hand-le-jeu-dadam-and-christianjewish-debate-in-norman-england/2A74BB2129EDFA331F2572ED11590221
62.
Source: cambridge.org
Link:https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/language-and-culture-in-medieval-britain/serpents-headjews-hand-le-jeu-dadam-and-christianjewish-debate-in-norman-england/2A74BB2129EDFA331F2572ED11590221